The role of Tipu Sultan in Forming India’s Independence Fields/ PART 1

Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education 

Tipu Sultan’s Role in Forming India’s Independence Fields 

Khadija Alemi1 & Seyyedeh Leila Mousavi Salem (Department of History, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran )

Correspondence: Khadija Alemi, Department of History, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of  Tehran, Tehran, Iran. E-mail: alemi1900@ut.ac.ir 

Abstract 

British East India Company was a commercial company in London. Queen Elizabeth I with the aim of gaining  commercial advantage in the Indian subcontinent granted a royal charter to this company. This advantage caused  to Britain’s military and political presence in the subcontinent. East India Company was become to a major  political-financial empire and Muslims of the Indian subcontinent, particularly in its southern regions began their  campaigns against political domination of this company. Tipu Sultan chief and ruler of Mysore’s Muslim  performed numerous efforts and campaigns to prevent the spread of British influence. This article tries to answer  to this question that how was Tipu Sultan’s role in forming India’s independence fields? This research’s main  claim is that Tipu Sultan got help from French troops against the company to reduce British influence in the  subcontinent but because of sabotages of number of leaders and bitter experience that some new Muslim Hindus  had from his actions he did not succeed. This research has been done in library and descriptive and analytical  method. 

Keywords: the Indian subcontinent, the British East India Company, Tipu Sultan, Mysore, Mala Bali battle  1. Introduction 

Before the arrival of Europeans to the Indian subcontinent for centuries a Muslim Mongol Empire ruled the  Indian subcontinent. When the Europeans entered to the Indian subcontinent by sea, their political and military  opponent were mostly Mongolian princes and rulers of the Indian subcontinent, but they didn’t have their early  unity and strength and they were changed to feudal and luxury and division state. The agents of English East  India company by influence in the state of Bengal and participate in provocations and categories of officials and  local rulers could break resistance of Siraj al-Dawla, the last Hindi ruler of Bengal and with the victory over him  in War of Plassey (1757 AD), and applied their complete domination and influence on India (Bazargan, 2008, p.  103). British made India completely as a colony and India was become to a submissive and obedient and puppet  country for the first time. But Britain, contrary to what assumed was not irrigated and uncontested in the Indian  subcontinent, soon French established a company in the India too and became a competitor for complete  domination of British. Local rulers of the Indian subcontinent, some of them served in favor of the British East  India Company and some of them served in favor of French East India Company. Competition with French was  intense so that British East India Company had forgotten other competitors. Tipu Sultan local ruler of Mysore  who had come to this position after his father Hyder Ali and he was opposed to the presence of the British in the  subcontinent like his father benefited from French advisers in his army. Both Tipu Sultan and his father Hyder  from strained relations of Britain and France and they were trying to overthrow the domination and influence of  Britain in the Indian subcontinent. Wellesley the army chief of the company made a great effort to satisfy Tipu to  fire French advisers dismissed from his army and to terminate their service but Tipu continued to resist. In the  eyes of British Tipu and Muslims in southern India will be a major obstacle on the way to meeting the goals of  the company in India. Therefore they tried to achieve their goals by different ways such as lure fans of Tipu  Sultan and threatened them. Finally British defeated Tipu in Malavalli battle and they occupied and engaged his  capital, Seringapatam. One of the main reasons of the failure of Tipu Sultan was feud of him and his Muslim  fans with Hindus because Tipu was a fanatical Muslim and had brought a large number of Hindus to Islam by  force just after the Mangalore treaties that Tipu killed a lot of Hindus and caused to Martaha have bitter  experience from his actions and during the crisis years of Tipu’s government and revenge for the massacres from  him. Researchers and scholars, including English, Arabic and Persian have evaluated subject of British  colonialism, British East India Company establishment and popular struggles of the subcontinent for independence and have discussed and studied on it. These researchers have mentioned campaigns and relations  of Tipu Sultan with the British East India Company during their discussions and only a few of them in particular  have evaluated the issue of relations of Tipu Sultan with the British East India Company. Including resources  which have evaluated the subject of British colonialism in the Indian subcontinent and the establishment of the  company in the subcontinent and Tipu Sultan relations with the company, British East India Company book  authored by Brian Gardner can be noted. The author has evaluated information about the company establishment,  preparation and the process of its formation, activities of chiefs and involvement of Britain’s government in the  administration of the Indian subcontinent. Tipu Sultan, the emancipation ambassador of India is the title of  another book that has been written about this topic. Saeed Abbas Zadeh is the author of this book that has started  his discuss with the arrival of Islam in the Indian subcontinent, the establishment of Shiite governments and  Mughal and Muslim Sultans in India and has ended his discussion with talk about the arrival of Europeans to the  subcontinent and the establishment of the company there, Tipu Sultan’s life, his campaigns and reformations.  The Muslims in the Indian Freedom Movement book, written by Abdel Moneim al-Nimr is another work that it  can be noted in relation with this topic. This book is a report from time and way of the influence of Great Britain  in the Indian subcontinent, the situation of Muslim rule in India on the eve of the formation of British  colonization, the presence of various companies in India and their relations with each other and also with the  government of India, the awakening of the people of India and their efforts to achieve independence, India’s  freedom leaders and their beliefs. 

2. Tipu Sultan in Power in Mysore 

Shiite government of Mysore was formed when a large section of India involved in colonial. Government of  Great Britain was achieved successes in the Indian; in central and northern India, independent states had been  created that many rulers of them followed rules and policies of Great Britain and from a hand they were in  conflict with their neighbors and certainly in this divisions and interstate wars, what was damaged and destructed  was India’s Muslims force who were once homogeneous and united. At that time with the policy that Great  Britain had, there wasn’t unified India anymore and the Indian subcontinent was mired in lethargy (Abbas Zadeh,  2002, p. 77). 

Local governments were not independent and followed Britain. But with all these dependencies all of them  finally were destroyed and among them only Hyder Ali ruled that was independent remained. Hyder Ali was  Shia and he was one of the main enemies of Great Britain. Mysore that was one of important states and it was in  sensitive and a strategic region in terms of the geographical location was in his territory. He Fought not only  with Britain, but also with their neighbors that he suspected they wish presence of alien (Abbas Zadeh, 2002, p.  81). 

When Tipu in military school was passing high school, India was in chaos (Abbas Zadeh, 2002, pp. 73-72). For  the first time in 1608 AD it was contacted between the Gurkani government of India and Great Britain with the  presence of Captain Hawkins in the court of Jahangir and after that, British government in 1615 AD sent Thomas  Rone as ambassador to the Indian subcontinent and Britain activities was began as the business from this date  (Unknown, 1993, p. 110). 

During the reign of Aurangzeb, the Europeans could not obtain the rights and privileges in the Indian  subcontinent. Aurangzeb died in Deccan in 1707 AD and after him, his son Shah Alam then his other son  Bahadur Shah I ruled (Abbas Zadeh, 2002, p. 73). The two kings were involved in internal uprisings and  widespread differences between religious and ethnic minorities (Jalali, 1996, p. 58). 

Tipu Sultan during the reign of his father was like his minister and army obeied him. After the death of Hyder  Ali he followed in his father’s anti-colonial politics. Hyder Ali and his son Tipu Sultan had sworn on the Quran  to hate British forever, and destroy them (Bungardelvin, 1982, p. 38). British knew Tipu Sultan well and they  were aware of anti-British goals and spirit of him. 

Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan were difficult opponents that entered the hard failures to British and even it was close  to destroy the British East India Company, but their scope was limited to the south and they did not have effect  on the fate of the whole of India (Nehru, 1982, p. 1/455). Also the conditions had changed and Tipu Sultan was  alone after death of his father. In the neighborhood of Mysore, people who hated Hyder Ali from old were not  less and certainly these conditions made the influence of Britain more serious through neighbors (Abbas Zadeh,  2002, p. 87).

3. The First Britain Mysore War 

In 1780 AD Hyder Ali attacked at the head of an army to Carnatic. A part of this army led by his son Tipu,  besieged Orkut. In Prambakam war this army involved with Britain army under the command of Munro, Great  Britain troops withdrew and wealthy city of Porto-Novo and all of Carna occupied by Heyder Ali and Tipu  Sultan (Bungardelvin, 1982, p. 41). 

The war did not continued with the victory of Hyder until end, but the arrival of assistance force from Bengal  changed the course of the war. Finally, a peace deal was signed between Great Britain and the Nizam of  Hyderabad and according that Nizam of Hyderabad withdrew from his anti-British stand. In contrast, the  occupied area of Gunero by Great Britain was returned to them (al-Nimr, 1980, p. 35). 

Hyder Ali died in December 1782 AD and what he had provided for his son was a powerful and regular army  and occupied state by him (Mysore). Hyder Ali was a very powerful man and one of the brightest figures in the  history of India. He understood the importance of sea power and growing threat of British who relied on sea  power long time before others. He tried to organize an alliance of various forces of India to drive out the British  jointly but this effort of him did not have result (Nehru, 1982, pp. 455-456). 

4. The Second War of Britain-Mysore 

After the death of Hyder Ali, Tipu Sultan took his father’s policy and set the deportation of British from India as  the main purpose of him (al-Nimr, 1968, p. 42). One of those who were against Tipu Sultan after the death of  Hyder Ali was Shaikh Ayaz. He gave up Behnur to Mumbai army that was under the command of General  Matthews without firing even a shot in January 1783 AD (Bunggardelvin, 1361, p. 42). 

Tipu ended the presence of Great Britain’s force there in the short time. In this war, Mangalore was occupied by  Tipu, but at that time it was betrayed to Tipu by his French allegiant commander called Bussy. Thus a peace deal  was signed between Tipu and Britain’s allegiant in March 1784 AD. 

4.1 Mangalore Convention: The Truce of War between Tipu Sultan and Britain 

France and Britain that were in conflict with each other to more dominate on India for a long time signed a peace  treaty named Versailles in the July 20, 1783 AD (Bunngardlvinn, 1982, p. 42). This contract placed Tipu in a  difficult situation; because after publishing the news of peace between Great Britain and France, the French  forces resident in India refused the continuation of war against Great Britain, so the Mysore army tried to  continue the blockade alone (Abbas Zadeh, 2002, pp. 90-91). 

Tipu continued blockade for long time with trust to himself and organization of his forces that certainly were in  the status of low morale. Tipu who could keep the Mangalore Malabar Coast region in his blockade in addition  to occupation of Bednur Castle; after this he failed and couldn’t continue; because there was a risk that Sandia  Army (United Great Britain) to attack Mysore army. Tipu was forced to sign the Treaty of Mangalore in the  eleventh of March 1784 AD (Kulke & Rutermond, 1990, pp. 222-220; Shirazi, 1985, p. 250). According to that  he promised to withdraw all his forces from Carnatic. Great Britain, for its part promised to leave the Malabar  Coast. Both sides pledged to release prisoners of war. Thus, the second war of Britain-Mysore, which deeply  changed the status of both sides of the war, was ended (Bungardelvin, 1982, p. 43). 

British and Tipu Sultan knew that their competition in South India eventually will lead to another war, so both  sides were preparing themselves for this confrontation. Tipu started war against Martaha and Hyderabad in the  years 1786-1787 AD and joined some Martaha emirates to his land with the victory in this war; but Tipu despite  the victory signed a peace treaty favorable to them, because he feared to drive them into the arms of Great  Britain otherwise (Dulafooz, 1937, p. 257). 

Tipu expected another war with Great Britain so asked France for help. He sent two commissions to France,  which one of them did not go further than Constantinople and returned to India but the second commission, went  France in June 1788 AD. Tipu wanted a defensive and offensive contract with France against Great Britain. But  France was on the eve of the bourgeois revolution and was not in a position to send troops to far away land as  India. Already in 1784 and 1785 AD. 

Tipu had sent two commissions to Constantinople to Ottoman Sultan and had asked help for Caliph of the  Muslims. However, on that time Ottoman Empire was fighting with Russia and hoped to support from Great  Britain; hence he didn’t showed willingness to help Tipu (Bungardelvin, 1982, pp. 43-44). 

In the first half of the seventeenth century Rajah Travancore occupied the southern part of the Malabar Coast and  claimed the Malabar Coast, but he faced Hyder Ali’s anticipation. This led Rajah Travancore to know Mysore as  his main enemy and sought to attract friendship of Great Britain. In the second war of Britain-Mysore, Rajah Travancore helped Great Britain’s army. He feared he might be attacked by Tipu, he signed a subsidiary contract  with Great Britain in 1788 AD then he started to build fortifications at Kochi and vassal state of Mysore. Tipu’s  forces attacked theses fortifications at the end of 1789 AD. At this time, Great Britain attacked Mysore under the  pretext of supporting its confederate (Bungardelvin, 1982, p. 44). 

5. Tipu Sultan’s Reformations 

5.1 Administrative and Political Reformations 

Mesitenjer, the British commander, returned to London and Cornwallis was stationed instead of him in India in  1785 AD. He announced that he would not interfere in disputes between states, but in practice it was unlike this  because he prepared Nizam of Heyderabad again for war against Tipu (al-Nimr, 1980, p. 355). Tipu announced  himself as the king in Seringapatam, his capital, in 1787 AD. So he ended the formal power of Raja Hindu of  Mysore too (Bungardelvin & Kotovski, 1982, p. 43). 

Tipu name was the most familiar name of that territory and he was known as an anti-colonial hero in the late  eighteenth century in India. This sentence is famous by Tipu that said living one day as a lion is better than  living a hundred years as fox (Abbas, 2002, p. 93). This slogan of Tipu was in front of the states’ heads that were  one day with Tipu and another day against him. Tipu had made the country stable and secure so he made another  reformation in the country in 1788 AD (Kermani, 1928, pp. 398-400), but Tipu’s reformist movements did not  last long, because Great Britain had understood the power and talent of Tipu from long time ago and knew  relationships that Tipu had with France and Zaman Shah, Afghanistanin ruler and Ottoman king in the years.  Great Britain knew that finally Tipu’s efforts and extension of his relations with Islamic countries and their  confederates, would led to end of Great Britain’s domination on India; hence it tried to start another war and  provoke small states and Tipu’s neighbors against him and this was done by so many promises and even by  enticement and alluring (Abbas, 2002, p. 93). 

Tipu Sultan very trusted Muslims in his court and tried to repose the hardest responsibilities and authorities to  them, however, his efforts to place Muslim governors to supervise tax affairs that were in the hands of Brahman  only led to more bribery. Even Mirsadegh, Tipu’s responsible for tax administration was also partner in bribery.  Thus Tipu’s efforts to centralize tax collection work in a state apparatus and to abolish extensive rights of  ownership of feudal lords faced rebellious resistance. Tipu made a city to honor his name wherever he gained a  major success, and he settled forcibly some men and women there. Most of Tipu’s reformations were careless  and didn’t solve the country’s problems (including forcing people to change clothes, etc.) (Bungardelvin, 1982,  pp. 46-47). 

Tipu started strenuous efforts to attract help of other rulers who were his coreligionists. He resorted to Zaman  Shah the ruler of Afghanistan and ensure and convinced him to easy conquest of India. Zaman Shah invaded  Panjab, but he faced resistance of Sikhs and returned fatherland. Tipu also resorted for help to France. He sent  the second secret commission to France at the beginning of 1793 AD, but it was not clear that the negotiations of  commission were formed with whom and for what purposes. He decided to make closer relations with the  French living in India and once again tried to attract the help of French and secretly dispatched two envoys by  ship to abroad in 1797 AD. When the envoys arrived in Mauritius it was reported that the coup has been formed  in French, so coming envoys to France was in vain (Bungardelvin, 1982, pp. 47-48). 


Click here for part 2  of this article 

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post